First off. It should be stated a 501(c)3 organization is not allowed to endorse a political candidate. The way around it is to release a voter guide about the "issues" and assume that those who align with your organization will align with the person with the most yes-es. You know the people at AFA wish Huckabee's name started with an "F" just so they could have put him in front of Guiliani (although then they probably wouldn't support him because his name would be a swear word and we all know the Bible talks A LOT about swearing {sarcasm} ).
So what did I do? The only responsible Christian thing to do: I created my own version of an official AFA (only this time AFA = "Andy's Faith Awareness") 2008 Voter Guide to make fun of them. I included a Jesus column (as well as a column for me and the AFA as well). I added eight "faith based" issues the AFA should have mentioned. And I also assigned a numerical value to the AFA, Jesus, and Andy column on a scale of 1 to 10 on how important that would be to each "candidate". Take a look.
Now admittedly, I do not get to speak for Jesus. I will acknowledge this. I wish the AFA would. But given my extensive reading of scripture, the above 1-10 scale resembles how I interpret a modern-day Jesus would rank the political issues. Please also note, that I do not always "agree" with Jesus. Why? It isn't because I am right and Jesus is wrong; but because I at least have the integrity to recognize that what I think about our current American socio/political culture is potentially wrong.
What I would rather point out is the difference between AFA and Jesus. I hate to break it to you, but Jesus could careless about gun laws and taxes. Remember his answer about paying taxes to Caesar? The ambivalence was astonishing. Don't get me wrong, I want small government. I want low taxes. But to say that low taxes is a "faith" issue is irresponsible at best.
But now lets look at what Jesus did talk about more than just about any other topic: taking care of the poor? Ohh but wait, it isn't on the list. Ohh so gun laws and taxes make the list, but taking care of the poor somehow is not a family value?
Let's talk about pro-life. Sure we all know Jesus is against abortions, but what about the death penalty? What about health care? I hate to break it to you, but being pro-life is more than being anti-abortion.
But then I get the predictable response from my friend when I object and she states:
Are you going to mention in your blog that it is the church’s responsibility to take care of the poor (not the government)?Now I don't blame her for this comment. Why? Because it is quite the popular assumption within the faith community. But I have to call BS. That mindset is fine, but you don't get your cake and eat it too. If you are going to scream at the top of your lungs for traditional marriage and abortion, then you have stated that your intentions are to yield the "churches" role, at least in part, to the government. If you want to lobby the government for pro-life laws, then you better be willing to lobby the government for poverty laws as well.
So why does this matter? Well you will notice that I put "?" marks under the candidates column for the issues I created. When I originally went to do this I was going to include where I thought the candidates stood on these issue. But then I realized that was the wrong approach. The AFA (and other's like it) have a lot of authority in a very powerful constituency. Millions of people look to them for political guidance. But if they turn non-faith issues into faith issues (i.e. gun laws), and forget to mention issues that are faith issues (i.e. poverty laws), then they are doing a huge disservice to the American political arena, and more importantly the body of Christ.
As a Christian political group, we must recognize that we are following Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove and Fox News closer than we are following Jesus - and that is a horrendous offense. As Barack Obama said at a recent Sojourners event in Atlanta, GA, "before we get carried away, let's read our Bibles now. Folks haven't been reading their Bibles."
I will close with this. Before I get labeled a helpless liberal, I want to state sincerely I have not decided who I am voting for. The way I look at it, I am either voting for Huckabee or Obama. The point is, I would vote for each of them because of what my faith tells me is important. Neither Huckabee or Obama or Guiliani or Edwards are Jesus Christ. Neither one of them is right on every issue. The AFA can continue to follow Coulter and Hannity and Limbaugh and Rove, but for me, I will follow Christ.






I really dig Jesus, and Jesus really digs life, since he declared that he "came to give [us] life, and life more abundantly." So, seeing that he digs life, I conclude that he digs Iraqi's and Afghans as well as womb blanketed babies. It kind of leaves me conflicted. I wish we had the cloning thing down back when William Wilberforce was doing his thing, or at least Abe, or Churchill! So, I have to conclude for now, what most Jesus-people should conclude much more often than we do: I DON'T KNOW.
I also can't help but wonder that this less than honest approach in the end ultimately hurts their (and any other Christians') attempt to further the goals of the gospels.
I do disagree with a couple of your ratings in the Jesus column, primarily based on old testament inerpretations on a couple of issues. But the whole idea of your voter idea is both provocative and correct.
I think the question we need to ask is what is the most important issues at this point for a voter to consider? Is it gun policy, or a wrongfully waged (aka based on dishonesty) war that is draining our national resources? I also can't help but wonder if spending too much time on the Fox channel hurts a testimony.
You have also said that you're a Bible believer, but where is your discernment in this matter?!
You've stated:"The way I look at it, I am either voting for Huckabee or Obama. The point is, I would vote for each of them because of what my faith tells me is important. Neither Huckabee or Obama or Guiliani or Edwards are Jesus Christ. Neither one of them is right on every issue."
Reply:
Your point was made, but is not your "faith" cluing you into the fact that Obama stands in stark contrast to words of truth?
A Christian must only exercise the ability to choose and stand for that which is right or righteous (In Jesus alone). While at the same instance turning away from that which is wrong,or wicked. Doing so based on what is seen in the Biblical standard alone.
Throughout your presentation you've compared and thrown Jesus' name around with politics, but in the end what is your point? Do you have one? Or are you just complaining to complain? I really fail to get what your pushing toward in this posting. Are you trying to move the masses to greater commitment to Christ, because if you are you're not staying in line with scripture. All I see is guile and anger, pushed towards others which are standing for and fighting for the truth found in Jesus (AFA).
Therefore, my point is this: There will never be a politician that will ever hold to all that is scriptural (Jesus alone was and is perfect one) and secondly why fault a Christian organization for giving their support for the politician that best fits the Biblical standard?!
Your options are two fold:
First you can vote, based on the biblical standard of truth (what's found in The Bible- as a true bible believer).
OR
Secondly, you can choose not to vote at all. But doing so in honor and with integrity.
AND if you have any hint of understanding yourself you most certainly would not be suggesting that Jesus and Obama are in the same camp.
I would also encourage you to take a little more time to read the Bible and stop listening to the radio and television broadcasts. Know what you stand for and then fight a truly good fight. Fight for Him and His standards and not the worlds! Don't distort truth with falsehood and don't compare what is good with what is not.
Word of encouragement: Read through the Bible and analyze your heart to see if you're in Jesus. Because your going about way, in the wrong way.
I have no problem standing behind Huckabee. As, I have true Biblical rational to support my decision.
Yeah Andy. How about spendin' more time in the Word. You've obviously been given over to a reprobate mind.
And if you are, have Jesus take a mild laxative for a couple days.
Oxymoron.
These had me rolling on the floor laughing for like 10 minutes.
Also, Islam was not created by Christianity (or even as you claim because somehow they were asking for it due to their activity in the region).
Islam was created by Mohammed in a cave in the middle of Arabia. Then he systematically took over the Arabian peninsula by force and coercion. Did you know that Mohammed originally proposed that all Muslims would pray towards Jerusalem, except then Jerusalem rejected his attempts of coercion.
It is true that Christians have done some very negative things in there past. Bu Jesus himself did not; Mohammed did.
Christians acting poorly towards humanity are a deviation from how Christ lived and called us to live. Muslims acting poorly towards humanity are exactly how Mohammed lived and called them to live.
Sources:
Read Entire Bible
Read Entire Qu'ran
http://www.2timothy42.org/Resources/essay.php?EssayID=14
You are always entitled to your opinion and you are welcome anytime at 2Timothy42.org.