« Corona Makes Me Wish I Were at a Beach (and not drinking beer)Why Don't We Just Bomb Them »

Who's My Accuser?

07/19/06

Permalink 06:00:00 am, by andy Email , 403 words
Categories: Government, Law

Who's My Accuser?

TrafficCameraAbout a month ago, I received something I have always wanted to receive: a traffic citation through the mail because of a traffic camera. Now I know you think I am nuts. But I'll explain why in a second. The problem was in this instance, this particular traffic citation was from Australia, for speeding, and there was no cheap way to fight it. However, there also was no way for them to enforce it either, so I didn't pay it. One of my friends even suggested that I "take a picture" of the $200 they were requesting in fines and send them the photo. I thought that was humorous, but passed.

I should note that this brings my speeding ticket count up to eight, in five states, and now two countries. That's pretty impressive, right? But I digress.

Ok...so even though this wasn't quite what I have always wanted, it is a good premise to talk about traffic citations with the use of cameras. Most Americans don't realize that we all have the right to cross examine our excuser when being accused of a criminal offense. Now, the problem is, if the only "accuser" in the situation is a traffic camera, you have no ability to cross examine said traffic camera.

Now according to Scottsdale, AZ mayor, public opinion poll reveals that 65% of people are ok with red light traffic cameras (he call's this "widespread opinion," I hardly called 65% widespread, but, ok "I'll bite.") Now you say, Andy, that's cool. Why not enforce people who run red lights. Just like the seatbelt law, again, I have to ask the question, where does it stop? There are already some in Arizona considering traffic cameras for speeding (like Australia). But does it stop there? Or does the camera, alas George Orwell's 1984 prophecy come true, become the here all, end all, in law enforcement. Lets just put cameras up everywhere and we'll all be a lot safer. Thus yielding the power to anyone in power to take creative liberties to any photo with a $299 purchase of Photoshop.

For me, I'll stick with the founders of this country and demand the ability to cross examine my excuser. It might create a slightly more "volatile" country, but I'll take that risk to live in freedom from Big Brother and Photoshop. After all, who’s going to believe me when I call Photoshop to the stand as my accuser?

2 comments

Comment from: Sarah [Visitor]
hmmm, so Stalin used Photoshop back in the day - well, he had a team who did the job of Photoshop... and congrats on the tickets :)
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/06 @ 15:11
Comment from: Lissa [Visitor]
My liberal heart rejoices at this post. :-)
PermalinkPermalink 07/19/06 @ 15:16

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be displayed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
    September 2008
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
     << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30        

    You've heard it before on air, Andy is Allen's young, single, celibate, college-boy producer and he is tired of letting Allen do all the talking. Andy's Blog is where Andy gets the mic and is able to express his views on whatever topic he feels like. However, it should be stated that Andy's views do not necessarily represent those of Allen's or the Allen Hunt Show. In addition to that, Andy's views at times can be a bit for raw, so if you are sensitive to this, please just stick with Allen.

    More information about Andy can be found at www.2timothy42.org or Andy's Virb.

    P.S. As has been mentioned on air, Andy is horrible at grammar and spelling. Please excuse any mistakes, trust me, he's sorry.

    Search

    XML Feeds

    powered by b2evolution free blog software